tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post1278310891689170670..comments2023-09-05T09:06:09.136-05:00Comments on Atop the Fourth Wall: Chuck Norris Karate Kommandos #1Lewis Lovhaughttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06724769374732321363noreply@blogger.comBlogger106125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-67495336248253116572011-09-01T23:01:13.634-05:002011-09-01T23:01:13.634-05:00Damnit Chuck, I'm trying to take you seriously...Damnit Chuck, I'm trying to take you seriously here.enigmus20https://www.blogger.com/profile/07342398525612663696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-8997444368312610442011-08-12T11:51:51.840-05:002011-08-12T11:51:51.840-05:00Also, why is his team called the "Karate Komm...Also, why is his team called the "Karate Kommandos" when two of his teammates are a samurai and a sumo wrestler? Last I heard, Jiujitsu (the traditional martial art of samurai) and sumo were NOT karate. <br /><br />The whole gay marriage debacle on here has to be pathetically humorous to me, being both gay, a mormon (complete with jokes about polygamy) and with friends that are in multiple-partner relationships. I'm not going to comment on it, for fear of the backlash and extending the idiocy further, but I will say that I'm now tempted to make a "Bachelor lions live in gay prides" joke.SynjoDeonecroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08797975991138870677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-56915617005500520732011-01-20T23:52:50.042-06:002011-01-20T23:52:50.042-06:00Why does the term "small name, big ego" ...Why does the term "small name, big ego" come to mind when talking about Chuckie?<br /><br />Ooh, THAT'S the supercruiser? Man, Roddimus Prime is going to be so jealous...<br /><br />Why the hell does the Super Ninja look like Van Halen via Kabuki dance?<br /><br />Finally, if he had really done that flying kick in the stinger (which is a really bad idea in ANY serious martial arts battle), one of two things would've happened; he would've broken his foot slipping on the glass and gotten run over by his target, or his belly would've been shredded open by the hole in the windshield he just punched through.SynjoDeonecroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08797975991138870677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-12774652575970449092010-10-17T18:33:21.221-05:002010-10-17T18:33:21.221-05:00Mr. Lovhaug ( I hope I spelled your name right),
...Mr. Lovhaug ( I hope I spelled your name right),<br /><br />I recently heard about your show from one of my parishioners. I am a minister with MCC (Metropolitan Community Church).<br /><br />As a lesbian Christian, a feminist and a comic fan, I am glad to hear that someone like you is around. <br /><br />I look forward to your continued work!<br /><br />Now I direct this next line to "Lili" who said:<br /><br />"Linkara, you are one of two Christians that give me hope for Christianity and make me rethink my belief it's such a joke. Too bad you and the other person (a very sweet, very snarky, very devout Christian who happens to also be a lesbian) are two voices being drown out by the idiots."<br /><br />Trust me. There are alot more of us than you think. These loud and obnoxious voices you here are not as many as their noise would suggest.<br /><br />So don't judge Christianity simply by the rudeness or close-mindedness of some.<br /><br />After all, the same could be said of any group. For example, I have been insulted and attacked for my orientation by Atheists as well, but I also know many good hearted Atheists as well.<br /><br />The key is to not allow the venom of some to make you despise an entire group.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-51576664833687774122010-06-02T15:39:41.146-05:002010-06-02T15:39:41.146-05:00@Linkara: You know what? I overreacted. This does ...@Linkara: You know what? I overreacted. This does not mean I changed my mind by any degree (I have already started a rebuttal which I'll probably post on TGWTG eventually) but getting upset by the one-off joke was uncalled for. I also realize, in hindsight, my argument was poorly worded and should have been laid out in a more precise manner to properly describe my views (which I have done better in the past).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03497321137931883372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-8325647440809911822010-05-31T13:23:09.250-05:002010-05-31T13:23:09.250-05:00Taunting overweight people! Having lame kid sideki...Taunting overweight people! Having lame kid sidekicks! Having even lamer villains! <br /><br />Chuck Norris: Karate Kommandos has it all!<br /><br />A friend told me about your site. I'm glad that his praise was right on the money. Great review!<br /><br />PS: Linkara, as a Gay Christian I just wanted to say, thank you for your kind words. You are a credit to our faith.KyleRnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-57280101139982343402010-05-28T11:38:31.649-05:002010-05-28T11:38:31.649-05:00Double cover-up? Maybe they're actually using ...Double cover-up? Maybe they're actually using a Peterbilt, and the RV is a distraction?Elita5https://www.blogger.com/profile/07301274722502013785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-51942637335486743492010-05-27T20:35:27.448-05:002010-05-27T20:35:27.448-05:00If this 'supercruiser' is meant to be so a...If this 'supercruiser' is meant to be so advanced and secretive then why the hell are they showing it at all? And to elementary kids at that! Does the FBI regularly show what make of cars it uses to follow suspects? Does the CIA let the press look at the engines of the UAVs?Gyrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11139372297929361578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-69573386460383895772010-05-27T14:20:55.984-05:002010-05-27T14:20:55.984-05:00"Also marriage for only reproduction would ma..."Also marriage for only reproduction would make total sense if we only allowed reproductive couples to marry and not allow them to ever use any kind of birth control."<br /><br />This reminds me strongly of medieval marriage lawsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-83770833183023455222010-05-27T13:28:24.614-05:002010-05-27T13:28:24.614-05:00Yeah I know what you mean by the "start hatin...Yeah I know what you mean by the "start hating gay marriage kid" joke. I hate it when one of the people I look up to turns out to have some insane irrational view on something. It just ruins all that you thought about that person. <br /><br />Also I might as well jump on the gay argument. I love reading these and seeing the people against gay whatever making up a bunch of bull, and then get smashed by actual logic. <br /><br />I personally think that sexuality isn't like the sides of a coin. Its more like a spectrum. Or a percentage to make things easy to explain. Not many people are 100% gay or 100% straight. Everyone is somewhere in between. I have gay friends that admit that they really like boobs. Does that make them not as gay? Or how about one guy I know who is on the straight side but now and then includes his girlfriend in butt play. Is he not straight after all? Who knows except for him. There's really not a fork in the road for sexuality. Its more like where you stand on a bridge. The people that see where they are on that bridge and are comfortable with it are the good people. The ones who are not comfortable are the ones starting the problems we see here.<br /><br />Also marriage for only reproduction would make total sense if we only allowed reproductive couples to marry and not allow them to ever use any kind of birth control.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-6930387478044736702010-05-27T04:13:05.446-05:002010-05-27T04:13:05.446-05:00people should read this before continuing the disc...people should read this before continuing the discussion any further <br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_homosexualityAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-34388120192530797432010-05-27T03:55:59.427-05:002010-05-27T03:55:59.427-05:00"We should eliminate marriage altogether, and..."We should eliminate marriage altogether, and skip straight to the sex, right? Doesn't get more natural than that."<br /><br />Amen to that brother <br />:DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-27976992625870185032010-05-27T01:44:31.677-05:002010-05-27T01:44:31.677-05:00*grabs some popcorn, reads the comments*
Has anyo...*grabs some popcorn, reads the comments*<br /><br />Has anyone mentioned homosexual behavior in swans yet?Dodger Of Zionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13566506876599468977noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-1040768407920577512010-05-26T22:42:58.668-05:002010-05-26T22:42:58.668-05:00"But if what you've been saying earlier w..."But if what you've been saying earlier was true, we should still allow filicide and cannibalism because they're both natural, regardless of our society."<br /><br />I wasn't aware that "it's natural" was the only requirement to allow anything you want, ever. Conversely, "it's unnatural" is a terrible reason to ban gay marriage - especially considering that marriage is a socially constructed institution, which means that heterosexual marriage is just as unnatural as homosexual marriage. We should eliminate marriage altogether, and skip straight to the sex, right? Doesn't get more natural than that.<br /><br />"Did the pig and the mantis have a reason for killing and eating its young even though there was plenty of food to go around? "<br /><br />I'm sure they do. I just haven't googled it. I know that lions, for example, will kill male young, so as not to have any rivals later on.<br /><br />"Was there a way around that? In that case we should be allowed to lick other people's feet, rummage through trash, trespass, and run around town in the nude without being given awkward faces and having the police called. "<br /><br />Clearly you did not read my previous post about how societal norms have eliminated the need or even the want for that (even though you copied and pasted it).<br /><br />"In fact. Since MARRIAGE isn't a natural animal act, we might as well not have it at all. "<br /><br />Oh hey, you beat me to it. :)<br /><br />"The whole Gay Marriage thing would be nothing since animals don't marry. Same goes for: education, government, money, cars, news, comfortable furniture, ATMs, businesses, video games, and finally, COMPUTERS."<br /><br />Again, human-constructed norms.<br /><br />"Also, animals don't have societies, is that still classified as 'natural'?"<br /><br />Wait, what? Animals don't have societies? What???<br /><br />"If you want to do what is 'natural', be my guest and ditch the stuff I listed, and live your life, free as a bird, doing what you do as long as the animals do it."<br /><br />Congratulations on intentionally missing any point I've made in this entire conversation.<br /><br />Pro-tip: the only reason I've been making the "natural" argument is because some genius said that gay marriage should be banned because homosexuality is "unnatural."Lotus Princenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-67927505559101574082010-05-26T22:38:29.811-05:002010-05-26T22:38:29.811-05:00"That's not a complete argument. I have n..."That's not a complete argument. I have not seen any form of reproduction between a male and a male."<br /><br />I haven't seen any form of reproduction between a sterile couple. Let's ban sterile people from getting married.<br /><br />"Psychologically, we are not animals."<br /><br />Biologically, we are. What are we, if not animals? Plants? Fungi? We have to fit into ONE of the seven kingdoms.<br /><br />"We think more than animals, and the expressing of our behavior is not as limited. While we can express ourselves through speech, gesture, writing, etc, animals cannot."<br /><br />Some animals can - gorillas and dolphins, for instance.<br /><br />"Animals "borrow," so to speak, the manifestations of the instinct of reproduction to manifest the instincts of dominance, aggressiveness, fear, gregariousness and so on. This borrowing does not mean that they are homosexual."<br /><br />Of course not - changes of hormones in the womb would mean that they are homosexual.<br /><br />" In this case, how do you know that the animals you speak of are really homosexual, and not just borrowing those manifestations of reproduction?"<br /><br />That's what constant research is for - following select animals for an extended period of time. It would also help to catch animals at a time other than mating season.<br /><br />"The term homosexuality is limited to the human species, because in animals we can ascertain only motor behavior."<br /><br />So what you're saying is that homosexual animals can't exist because humans can't see it? I guess that means that there is no such thing Neptune, because I've never seen it - only speculative pictures in textbooks.<br /><br />"As for the 'not all animals reproduce' thing, what species of animals are there that don't need to reproduce exist?<br /><br />"As for the 'not all animals reproduce' thing, what species of animals are there that don't need to reproduce exist?"<br /><br />I wasn't referring to a specie. I was referring to specific animals. Not all humans reproduce, not all animals of particular species reproduce.<br /><br />"Or are you talking too about the fungi? Such as the sea sponge and mushrooms? Or are you really saying that not all WANT to reproduce? In the animal's case you are wrong. "<br /><br />Ah, so you've read the mind of every animal ever. Damn, I severely underestimated you.<br /><br />"And as for your “Humans=Animals” thing, show me those animal schools that teach their young the ABCs,"<br /><br />Wow, I feel like an idiot - this entire time, you were just trolling me.<br /><br />Yeah, it turns out that humans have somehow surpassed all forms of biological classification because we invented schools. We are no longer considered to be mammals because...uh...you say so.Lotus Princenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-17303662506801364252010-05-26T22:29:03.541-05:002010-05-26T22:29:03.541-05:00Rate of death from infectious diseases, compare a ...Rate of death from infectious diseases, compare a wealthy nation with decent health care to a poor nation with poor health care. Please look it up. If diseases were unnatural, then the rate wouldn't differ too much.<br /><br />Also, I seem to remember several species that when the females were taken out of their world view, the males started having sex with each other, and when a female was reintroduced, they were uninterested in the female. I want to say cockatiel is the bird I'm thinking of there. I do know happy homosexual penguin pairs have been recorded. The Japanese macaque have homosexual couples engage in courtship as well. Homosexual black swans have been known to just use a female for the eggs and then drive her off to live in peace together. In fact, more cygnets from homosexual black swan pairings survive to adulthood than heterosexual ones.<br /><br />"Unnatural" means "not occurring without help in nature." Homosexuality happens in nature without human help. Learn a new way to oppress the minority.<br /><br />Linkara, you are one of two Christians that give me hope for Christianity and make me rethink my belief it's such a joke. Too bad you and the other person (a very sweet, very snarky, very devout Christian who happens to also be a lesbian) are two voices being drown out by the idiots.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03311056622748218909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-27612386709755563522010-05-26T21:33:15.715-05:002010-05-26T21:33:15.715-05:00HAH! We are so frickin' animals. Every daily b...HAH! We are so frickin' animals. Every daily behavior I see can be traced back to something more primitive. Sure, we're unique among the local fauna, but we really need to get over ourselves.Dan Shivehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13378394614896042626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-36003305981979356782010-05-26T19:39:47.140-05:002010-05-26T19:39:47.140-05:00Continued-
“Animals have their reasons for that. ...Continued-<br /><br />“Animals have their reasons for that. Human society works its way around such things. Maybe millenia ago it might've been an idea, but it's obsolete now.” <br /><br /><b>But if what you've been saying earlier was true, we should still allow filicide and cannibalism because they're both natural, regardless of our society. Did the pig and the mantis have a reason for killing and eating its young even though there was plenty of food to go around? Was there a way around that? In that case we should be allowed to lick other people's feet, rummage through trash, trespass, and run around town in the nude without being given awkward faces and having the police called. I mean, if licking feet, rummaging, trespassing, and being naked is natural because the animals do it, why can't we? Insects, and forest/house mammals trespass in human territory all the time. Male porcupines urinate on the females before mating. Cats and Dogs mark territories with their urine. Bears scratch big gaping holes in trees. <br /><br />In fact. Since MARRIAGE isn't a natural animal act, we might as well not have it at all. The whole Gay Marriage thing would be nothing since animals don't marry. Same goes for: education, government, money, cars, news, comfortable furniture, ATMs, businesses, video games, and finally, COMPUTERS. Also, animals don't have societies, is that still classified as 'natural'?<br /><br />If you want to do what is 'natural', be my guest and ditch the stuff I listed, and live your life, free as a bird, doing what you do as long as the animals do it.</b>MalixDexidehttp://uglybirdmania.deviantart.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-75396625512441447632010-05-26T19:37:40.884-05:002010-05-26T19:37:40.884-05:00“Oh man, I lol'd.”
That's not a complete ...“Oh man, I lol'd.”<br /><br /><b>That's not a complete argument. I have not seen any form of reproduction between a male and a male.</b><br /><br />“Okay, that's one solitary species of animal out of how many? There are more than six million species of insects alone, you know. Dogs aren't representative of every animal ever.”<br /><br />“Pro-tip: humans are animals. If your logic held, then there'd be no such thing as a homosexual human either - not to mention that not all animals (nor all humans) reproduce.”<br /><br />“It's also foolish and unscientific to assume that all animals function in the same exact way, and that homosexuality is a fluke that exists only in humans (which, by the way, are animals).”<br /><br /><b>Psychologically, we are not animals. We think more than animals, and the expressing of our behavior is not as limited. While we can express ourselves through speech, gesture, writing, etc, animals cannot.<br />Animals "borrow," so to speak, the manifestations of the instinct of reproduction to manifest the instincts of dominance, aggressiveness, fear, gregariousness and so on. This borrowing does not mean that they are homosexual. An animal that goes after a male to prove it is #1, will eventually go after the female some time later. Especially during (in mammals), the mating season.<br />Hey! Maybe the animals will hump something to make sure it is ready WHEN the mating season comes! In this case, how do you know that the animals you speak of are really homosexual, and not just borrowing those manifestations of reproduction? Do you even know if the animal knows what homosexuality even is? What you are doing is linking animal behavior with human behavior. <br /><br />The term homosexuality is limited to the human species, because in animals we can ascertain only motor behavior. Specifically, meaning what it looks like they're doing. Since the expression of the animal is limited, we can't use what looks like homosexuality in an animal as means of calling it natural.<br /><br />I have never “assumed” that all animals function in the exact same way. Or did you say that because I used the dog as an example? God forbid I use an EXAMPLE!<br /><br />As for the 'not all animals reproduce' thing, what species of animals are there that don't need to reproduce exist? Or are you talking too about the fungi? Such as the sea sponge and mushrooms? Or are you really saying that not all WANT to reproduce? In the animal's case you are wrong. The animal will have the drive/instinct to reproduce unless the animal is neutered or spayed, which requires human assistance.<br /><br />And as for your “Humans=Animals” thing, show me those animal schools that teach their young the ABCs, and their animal hospitals that have animals caring for the young and old, and their animal governments that protect the animals with their animal army, and their animal game boys, that they use for entertainment, and their animal writing material to write books, and their written animal language, and their animal toiletries. So far I have seen none of that.</b>MalixDexidehttp://uglybirdmania.deviantart.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-21950656362494453932010-05-26T19:28:44.612-05:002010-05-26T19:28:44.612-05:00Everyone's at least a LITTLE gay. Just look at...Everyone's at least a LITTLE gay. Just look at David Boreanaz and tell me you wouldn't feel safe in his arms.<br /><br />On the hot topic of sumo wrestlers, I get annoyed every time I see one portrayed as a hungry hungry hippo character. Sumo Wrestlers are huge and fat, yes, but the good ones are disciplined about what they eat (even if it is a large quantity) and work out a lot. They've got plenty of fat, but they've got plenty of muscle, too. This comic was far from the worst I've seen, I'd still like to see more respectable portrayals of sumo wrestlers in general.<br /><br />Then again, if a sumo character is being included, it probably is as a gimmick, so the most respectable portrayal is probably none at all ^^;Dan Shivehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13378394614896042626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-69939957725234764332010-05-26T19:22:40.158-05:002010-05-26T19:22:40.158-05:00What the...? *looks at the top of the page* Yes......What the...? *looks at the top of the page* Yes...it says this is the comments of Atop The Fourth Wall. What's all this darn serious posting regarding the legality of same-sex marriages doing here? Well, you're not dragging me into that trap, I can tell you!<br /><br />First, I'm going to talk about my opinion of the latest review. Another great pick, Mr. Lovhaug. I liked this one because, after having some rather painful subjects being thrown on the fire, this one didn't have me reaching for the aspirin. Yes, Chuck Norris Karate Kommandos was dumb and dull, but not to the point were I cursed myself for not acquiring a taste for alcoholic beverages and thus not being able to drink the memories of such horrors away.<br /><br />Second, I am going to mention something regarding one of your posts in response to the whole same-sex marriage kerfuffle. However, I am still not getting involved in that argument. I'm referring to where you say "the digestive tract is in fact better suited for handling roughage, plants, and other assorted non-traditionally "alive" elements, assuming we take the word "alive" to be more of a basis of animal rather than plant life, since I'm sure some people would argue that plant life is still life."<br /><br />While it is true, the human digestive tract does differ from those of carnivores, it is still not that of a herbivore ether. Simply put, we are pretty much designed as omnivores, and it is difficult (though, admittedly, not impossible) for humans to live solely on a diet based on meat or vegetation. I am not putting the kibosh on anyone who wants to pursue a vegetarian lifestyle for ethical, religious, or any other personal choices. However, to say mankind is meant to be a herbivore? The science doesn't back up that statement. Now, if you will excuse me, I'm thinking of making up some more country-fried SPAM! :)Patch O'Blackhttp://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DF447047E3E3DED6noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-43785729073457321992010-05-26T15:53:50.626-05:002010-05-26T15:53:50.626-05:00" Paul S. said...
DesertEagle - I love how a ..." Paul S. said...<br />DesertEagle - I love how a one-off joke at Norris's political activities is somehow oppressing you."<br /><br />He's just confused about his own sexualityAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-78672788506194589042010-05-26T14:55:54.823-05:002010-05-26T14:55:54.823-05:00"You really don't get it do you? When a m..."You really don't get it do you? When a male attempts to do a "homosexual" act to another, the other male will or will attempt to retaliate."<br /><br />Unless, of course, the recipient is another (willing) homosexual.<br /><br />"Because he does not want to be lower than the other animal."<br /><br />Gay sex isn't only utilized for dominance.<br /><br />"Because a male [unintelligible] another male doesn't do it as means of [unintelligible], but as DOMINANCE."<br /><br />Sometimes, maybe even often. But not always.<br /><br />"It is NOT because it is homosexual! It means he is #1 and even sends a message to the female animals saying that HE'S the one they want."<br /><br />See above.<br /><br />"Another thing I want to note is that with dogs, they will want to [unintelligible] the first thing they can come in contact with, if they catch wind of a female in heat, but cannot locate her. Actually the smell of a female in heat causes a frenzy of those behaviors, because she releases a pheromone."<br /><br />Okay, that's one solitary species of animal out of how many? There are more than six million species of insects alone, you know. Dogs aren't representative of every animal ever.<br /><br />"Besides."<br /><br />That's not a sentence.<br /><br />"Reproduction is necessary for survival, therefore an animal can never be homosexual. "<br /><br />Oh man, I lol'd.<br /><br />Pro-tip: humans are animals. If your logic held, then there'd be no such thing as a homosexual human either - not to mention that not all animals (nor all humans) reproduce.<br /><br />"As said before, it is a foolish and unscientific approach to sentiment human behavior into animal behavior."<br /><br />It's also foolish and unscientific to assume that all animals function in the same exact way, and that homosexuality is a fluke that exists only in humans (which, by the way, are animals).<br /><br />"And oh yeah, and besides cannibalism, you would have to accept filicide, as something 'natural', which is the deliberate act of the parent killing their child. "<br /><br />Animals have their reasons for that. Human society works its way around such things. Maybe millenia ago it might've been an idea, but it's obsolete now.Lotus Princenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-11441068094050577512010-05-26T14:30:42.939-05:002010-05-26T14:30:42.939-05:00You know burce lee once whiped the floor whith chu...You know burce lee once whiped the floor whith chuck norris,why dosent any one worship him?captian ghosthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14365589128099135089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5809126056034906096.post-55783780430573041072010-05-26T12:53:48.981-05:002010-05-26T12:53:48.981-05:00You totally missed a trick at 10:40.
"You tu...You totally missed a trick at 10:40.<br /><br />"You turkeys won't get away with this!"<br /><br />"I'm not a chicken, YOU'RE A TURKEY!"ReddiShadownoreply@blogger.com